Games have historically served as a relatively low-risk way to test the potential of new technologies as they emerge, and I expect the same to be true for blockchain.My thesis for on-chain games is as follows.Onchain Asset Games, or Web2.5 Games, that leverage some blockchain technology while maintaining the syntax of traditional games off-chain will have to compete with already successful conventional games within their genre. In most cases, introducing web3 elements into the core game loop will actually take away from its fun. Therefore, web3 elements should be introduced at the engagement layer, independent of the core game logic, which means that the game should be entertaining enough on its own. On a separate note, I'm currently intrigued by the Risk to Earn (R2E) mechanism, also known as sustainable, zero-sum P2E.A Fully Onchain Game, or Autonomous World, where all game assets and logic are implemented on-chain, is still a long way off, but I think it has more potential than the games described above. While we shouldn't expect to see the next League of Legends from Fully Onchain Games, if done well, I think it's possible to see it becoming a minor but cult favorite genre amongst a wide variety of games. It's also important because it's where the newest technologies in the infrastructure space - ZK, rollups, sequencing, etc - will be tested in practice. There's still a long way to go, so let's see how this industry evolves.oyed